The portfolio has outgrown the old structure
New communities, acquisitions, living options, and markets no longer fit the website clearly.
The problem
The public website has to help future residents and families understand living options, compare communities, evaluate daily life, and decide whether to inquire or tour. Marketing also needs a dependable way to keep local information accurate across the operator’s portfolio.
New communities, acquisitions, living options, and markets no longer fit the website clearly.
Pricing, floor plans, availability, care options, amenities, activities, and daily life are difficult to compare.
Photos, staff, events, services, contact details, and local information require too much manual work.
Tour requests, forms, calls, referrals, and community inquiries do not consistently reach the right team or system.
What changes
Change the parts of the senior-living website that make communities, living options, family research, tours, and recurring updates harder while protecting the information, systems, and search value the operator already depends on.
The parts of the public website that need to become clearer, easier to operate, and more useful to technical buyers and the commercial team.
The value, content, and dependencies that should carry forward through the rebuild and after the new site is in place unless the evidence shows they need to change.
The work
The work is designed for Marketing, Sales, Regional teams, Community leadership, CRM owners, IT, and selected subject-matter reviewers who need the public website to work together without making every person a day-to-day project manager.
Review communities, living options, locations, content, family paths, floor plans, pricing, availability, tours, forms, CRM connections, analytics, URLs, publishing responsibilities, and stakeholder needs.
What this produces
Define how the operator, communities, living options, local information, floor plans, resources, events, tours, and forms should relate to one another.
What this produces
Create the new pages, move useful content, connect agreed systems, test inquiry and tour paths, validate redirects and analytics, and prepare the team to manage recurring updates.
What this produces
Investment
What determines the project
The investment depends on the number of communities, brands, living options, locations, content types, floor plans, systems, review requirements, and people involved in the work.
The $15,000 starting point is intended for a focused rebuild with a manageable number of communities, limited custom functionality, clear decisions, and a practical amount of content to move. Portfolio consolidation, multiple brands, large community directories, live availability data, extensive archives, or complicated CRM connections require a larger engagement.
Who this is for
The website already matters to community discovery, family research, tours, sales, or ongoing publishing, and there is a specific constraint worth solving.
You already operate an established senior-living organization, and the website has become difficult to manage across communities, living options, family decisions, and sales follow-up.
This work is not intended for first websites, simple brochure sites, isolated features, or projects without enough existing website value to justify a coordinated rebuild.
Questions before you start
These questions cover the practical details buyers often want to clarify before a manufacturing rebuild is defined.
The strongest fit is a regional or multi-community operator with several locations, living options, content types, or stakeholders. A substantial Life Plan or continuing-care community can also be a fit when its public website has meaningful complexity and an accountable project owner.
The project is often led by a Director or VP of Marketing, CMO, SVP or VP of Sales & Marketing, Digital Marketing leader, or Web Operations owner. Regional teams, community sales leaders, CRM owners, IT, and executive leadership usually contribute as stakeholders.
Yes. The structure can explain each living or care option while showing which communities offer it. The goal is to make differences clear without forcing every community into the same content model.
Yes. The experience can support adult children, spouses, caregivers, and future residents while recognizing that the most important researcher changes by community and living option.
Those details can be presented when the operator has approved information and a reliable source for keeping it current. The project identifies what the website should display and what system should remain responsible for the underlying data.
A community finder can be part of a larger website rebuild when people need a reliable way to find the right location or option. A standalone finder or search feature may be better treated as a separate feature project.
Yes. The website can connect forms, calls, tour requests, events, referrals, and community contacts to the operator’s existing sales process when the destination and handoff requirements are clear.
Where needed, the website can connect to systems such as a senior-living CRM, Salesforce, HubSpot, or another sales platform. The project defines what belongs in the website, what stays in the existing system, and what needs to pass between them.
Yes. Shared templates can keep the operator consistent while allowing community-specific information, imagery, living options, events, pricing, amenities, and contact paths to remain accurate.
The new site should give Marketing reusable page types and clearer ownership for routine updates. The project documents what central teams manage, what community teams provide, what needs review, and what remains connected to another system.
The project reviews important pages, content groups, internal links, metadata, redirects, canonicals, analytics, and search relationships before the new structure is finalized. No provider can promise unchanged rankings during a major website change, but avoidable risk should be identified and tested.
No. The operator and its designated advisors remain responsible for occupancy strategy, resident operations, clinical systems, billing, regulatory decisions, and compliance determinations. The website can be built to support the public information and system connections those teams approve.
It is intended for a focused rebuild with a manageable number of communities, limited custom functionality, clear decisions, and a practical amount of content to move. Portfolio consolidation, multiple brands, large community directories, live availability data, complex connections, or substantial migration work may require a larger project.
Next step
Start with the current website and what changed: portfolio growth, acquisitions, fragmented community pages, difficult updates, unclear living options, or weak family research paths.
Review the senior-living website